North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Big providers use NAT to squeeze little ISPs
- From: Karl Denninger
- Date: Wed Feb 26 20:37:27 1997
Keep the ad-hominen and invective out of the discussion.
I will return to talk about this when you have restarted your question with
an understanding of the above.
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
| 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "firstname.lastname@example.org" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
> Will you please explain to me how it is that the evil greedy
> conspiring bastards use their size dishonestly to slant the
> playing field? Please list the set of differentiated dishonest
> Besides, I was always under the impression that it wasn't the size
> of the money that mattered, but rather how you moved it.
> > > Karl,
> > >
> > > Sometimes I think you work for the Yoyodyne Corporation
> > > from some movie or another.
> > >
> > > Tell you what.
> > >
> > > You watch the capitalist system of our country reward
> > > companies that utilize new technology to encourage better service.
> > I happen to like that model. A lot.
> > The problem is, lots of people like to slant the playing field so that only
> > the guys on the top of the money pile can play in the same theatre, and
> > everyone else is relegated to the bottom.
> > There are some benefits of size that really are honestly earned. Then there
> > are those which are just plain improper (at minimum).
> > The trick is to differentiate between them.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -