North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: karl and paul, expostulating
- From: Dima Volodin
- Date: Thu Feb 20 11:39:13 1997
On 19 Feb 1997 21:55:30 -0800, you wrote:
>>>>>> "KD" == Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net> writes:
> KD> or a 421 error, which keeps the spam at the source (loading the
> KD> spammers mailserver -- a GOOD thing!)
>Are you joking? There's not a spammer alive that uses sendmail or
>something that would similiarly requeue on temporary failure.
> KD> Much more elegant, in my opinion.
>Assuming that 'sendspam' would actually maintain a queue.
>Paul's solution has its own elegance: raising the price for allowing
>antisocial behavior from bounced email to partial loss of
>connectivity. But like Paul said, raising the stakes like that just
>invites someone to try and one up him.
What's so elegant about that if a spammer with elementary knowledge
about SMTP and DNS can easily bounce his stuff off of any of the
thousands of unsuspecting hosts and/or use unsuspecting forwarding
name servers in the slave mode?
>Daniel Simms There is more than one way to burn a book.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -