Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)

  • From: Avi Freedman
  • Date: Wed Jan 15 11:19:47 1997

No, people (like me) are likely to upgrade so that we don't show up as withdrawing
> 100,000 routes/day to the RA even though we've had a 'deny .*' filter-list towards
them for many months (since we don't peer with anyone currently through the RA
at MAE-East).

Whether it's a bugfix or an optimization, it hasn't been bothering my routers
CPU-wise - and I suspect it hasn't bothered their oomphy rsd boxes.

But I'd like to think that most people who peer with the RSs follow these issues
and know to upgrade whether it's called a bugfix or not.

Avi

> On Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:39:15 EST 
>  "John W. Stewart III" <jstewart@metro.isi.edu> wrote:
> 
> > if you think it's a bug, then a fix is available
> 
> And more people are likely to upgrade if it is phrased as a bugfix.
> 
> > 
> > if you think it's an optimization, then the new code is available
> 
> This will make people think that it isn't anything to worry about.
> 
> > 
> > why are we still talking about this?
> > 
> 
> Because its still happening?
> 
> Neil.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.