North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: NAP/ISP Saturation WAS: Re: Exchanges that matter...
- From: David Schwartz
- Date: Tue Dec 17 14:38:21 1996
I'm quite curious how they handle full-duplex FDDI where
witholding the token doesn't seem to be an option. Do they simply drop
packets when traffic gets bursty?
Ironically, I'd prefer they drop the packet bound for a busy port
rather than stop all incoming traffic from a port until the busy port
If anyone has experience with NetStar's GigaRouters, especially
in comparison to the GigaSwitches, I'd love to hear about it. You can
reach me at email@example.com.
On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> > My (admittedly second hand) understanding is that the Gigaswitch/FDDI
> > actually has minimal amounts of buffering. During a congestion event, it
> > simply withholds the token, resulting in buffering in the routers. Queues
> > there eventually overflow, and ...
> This matches my understanding, though I think it understates the problem.
> Gigaswitches are essentially input-queued. When their teeny tiny buffers
> fill they flow-control everyone to slow them down. What this means is that
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -