North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Exchanges that matter...
- From: Jeremy Porter
- Date: Sun Dec 08 22:18:19 1996
In message <CMM-RU.firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rob Liebschutz writes:
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Joe Rhett wrote:
>> > > It is actually quite hard in practice to push a FDDI switch
>> > > into trouble, although theoretically it should be simple, modulo
>> > > the interesting effects that token-withholding can produce.
>> > Hm. Not sure what you mean. FDDI can certainly be over-utilized, that's
>> > not hard. On the other hard, FDDI doesn't fall down and die like
>> > Ethernet does when congested.
>> > > In practice, the limiting factor will tend to be the per-port
>> > > bandwidth rather than the aggregate bandwidth. One would have
>> At the Atlanta-NAP we offer full duplex FDDI, why not try to get MFS to do
>> it? Cisco now has a full duplex FDDI card, so you can do 200 Mbs into the
>Talk to Steve Feldman from MFS. At the October Nanog meeting he
>mentioned that their Gigaswitches (not sure if this is was just for
>MAE West) were ready to support Full Duplex FDDI and he invited
>volunteers to try it.
>Unfortunately, the GRF does not yet have a full duplex FDDI interface
>available, but when I asked about it, Ascend told me that they had
>implemented a CDDI interface in 3 weeks time to gain the business of
>of one customer.
Of course the rumor has it that CDDI was invented in about
that same length of time, so it can't be too hard to duplicate
Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc. email@example.com
PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708 | 1-800-968-8750 | 512-458-9810
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -