North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Exchanges that matter...
- From: Jonathan Heiliger
- Date: Fri Nov 29 16:05:25 1996
On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Derek Elder wrote:
|} So is there a better solution for someone that doesn't actually want a
|} POP there now? If PAIX is the smartest connection facilities wise,
|} that is where we want to be. Are 2 DS-3 connections per router allowed
|} at PAIX? That would be the best solution -- cohab a router at PAIX,
|} DS-3 back to our core and DS-3 up to Pacbell.
|}
|} What am I missing?
Just that you'll have to eat extra circuit costs. While PAIX is a nicer,
newer and cleaner facility than what MFS has in San Jose for MAE-West; I
don't recall too many failures or complaints about the quality of that
facility. Ask BBN where their SJ POP is located.
Since I don't think this list has turned into 'network-engineering' I'll
stay away from the P*B NAP vs. MAE-West point. ;-)
-jh-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
