North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
- From: Curtis Villamizar
- Date: Sat Aug 31 00:31:21 1996
In message <Pine.SOL.3.95.960830201535.15619Kfirstname.lastname@example.org>, "Dorian R
. Kim" writes:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Maybe it is time to get real metrics and real measurements of the different
> > pieces, so we can see where things are fine, where we have current problems
> > and where problems could be in the future.
> This goes beyond just public interconnects. If you are one level removed from
> NSP level, the status and performance of private interconnects between variou
> NSPs become a subject of great deal of interest.
> Here, the general dearth of information about performance and status gets eve
> worse than it is with public exchange points.
> I wonder if this is something involved parties (MCI, Sprint, UUNet and ANS)
> are willing to talk about, given that I've noticed some degradation on
> performance across some of these private interconnects already.. (and it's
> only been couple of months since they came online!)
> I understand that these are private arrangements between involved parties, bu
> given their importance, it would be a great service to the community if the
> involved parties could share some information.
I think your best bet is to run NPD. btw- Did you look at the NetNow
stats while they were still up?
Someone from Merit? Why were these stats removed?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -