Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: *** MAKE SPAM@INTERRAMP.COM DIE FAST!!! *** (fwd)

  • From: Ehud Gavron
  • Date: Wed Aug 21 23:05:33 1996

	Personally I'm all for it.

	My company, ACES Research, uses the mailer from Innosoft
	International, PMDF.

	It does application level refusals *PRIOR* to reception of
	the mail.  (Unlike sendmail which would accept the mail,
	then return it).

	Try sending mail from *@aol.com to *@aces.com, and see what you get :)

	:-)

	Ehud
	p.s. We do application-level filter as opposed to router-level
	     filtering because we want to log the connects/refusals as
	     they occur. (with sender/recipient attempted address)



>I see the following kind of message on a regular basis. How long before
>this kind of thing starts to cause significant problems? And lest you say
>that xmission.com is only a small unimportant provider, I've seen much
>larger ones also saying they do this and not everybody is as selective
>about only blocking one port.

>Michael Dillon                   -               ISP & Internet Consulting
>Memra Software Inc.              -                  Fax: +1-604-546-3049
>http://www.memra.com             -               E-mail: michael@memra.com

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:38:19 -0600 (MDT)
>From: Pete Ashdown <pashdown@xmission.com>
>Reply-To: inet-access@earth.com
>To: inet-access@earth.com
>Subject: *** MAKE SPAM@INTERRAMP.COM DIE FAST!!! ***
>Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:39:02 -0600 (MDT)
>Resent-From: inet-access@earth.com

>We have seen an inordinate amount of spam email sourcing from Interramp.com
>and their customers.  Despite frequent attempts to notify KEN ANDREWS, PSI,
>or any living soul at Interramp, our pleas have gone unanswered.  As a
>result, *ALL* SMTP mail traffic from Interramp's networks has been blocked at
>the router level here.

>I would encourage *EVERY* responsible ISP to do the same.  Interramp does not
>appear to care about spam problems, and in fact has become a haven for this
>type of crap due to their complicity.

>The following is instructions on how to block Interramp SMTP traffic on a
>Cisco:

>Make an extended IP access list:

>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.8.23.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.8.31.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.8.45.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.8.65.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.9.51.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.2.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.3.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.4.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.5.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.10.220.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.72.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.122.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.183.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.189.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.194.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.207.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.208.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.209.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.210.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.215.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.217.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.224.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.226.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.227.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.229.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.230.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.231.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.237.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.243.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.11.244.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.81.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.93.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.126.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.128.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.138.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.140.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.156.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.157.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.158.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.178.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.179.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.190.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.205.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.206.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.208.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.209.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.234.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.12.243.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.101.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.110.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.126.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.128.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.138.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.140.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.142.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.35.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.36.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.37.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.40.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.45.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.74.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.79.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.14.82.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 deny tcp 38.26.44.0 0.0.0.255 eq smtp any
>access-list 120 ip permit all all

>Due to the fact that Interramp's networks are not contiguous in any apparent
>way, you have to block each one on a class C basis.  If anyone sees any
>evidence otherwise, please let me know.  Of course, it wouldn't be a bad idea
>to block all of 38.0.0.0 because PSI hasn't been cooperative either.

>After the list is created, add it to your incoming interfaces with:

>ip access-group 120 in

>The 120 is arbitrary, it can be anything in the extended IP access-list range.

>============================== ISP Mailing List ==============================
>Email ``unsubscribe'' to inet-access-request@earth.com to be removed.
>Don't post messages that just say ``me too''.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.