Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

need for method of reducing ipV4 table size

  • From: Forrest W. Christian
  • Date: Wed Aug 21 21:06:48 1996

I've been slowly working on a method of reducing ipV4 table sizes in the 
core routers.  I don't want to go into details of exactly how this will 
work right now (It's irrelevant to the question I'm going to ask) but it 
would reduce the number of routes in the global routing table to under 

I'm to the point that I need to clean up my notes, put it into 
RFC-format and submit it as a draft, but before I go through all that 
work, I generally was wondering if those of you who actually run the 
"core" networks see a need for something to significantly reduce the table 
size.  The method I'm working on has the following "features".

1) Transparent to "end nodes" - no renumbering, no software changes
2) Software changes are confined to the "defaultless" routers.
3) Software changes are easy to implement - Someone who knows the 
router OS code well should be able to implement in a week or so, or a 
month at the most.
4) Low CPU impact - shouldn't impact the "core" router CPUs at all.  
"Customer Border" routers will have a minor impact - no more than IP 
filtering or some similar feature.
5) IPv4-specific.

I'd go into more detail, but I don't want to waste everyone's bandwidth.  

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Discussion Communities

About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home

Merit Network, Inc.