North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Avi Freedman
- Date: Fri Aug 02 11:35:05 1996
> The biggest problem with using non-routable ip addresses on numbered interfaces
> whether point to point or frame or atm or whatever, is that you lose outside
> connectivity from those interfaces. We tried this, but the essential
> traceroutes from our core routes are too important when debugging BGP
> problems to the outside.
> Robert Bowman
> Exodus Communications Inc.
Exactly. Especially when you have downstream customers who only announce
routes via BGP to you and/or other providers, it can be important for them
to be able to trace out with a source address that has global connectivity.
We usually use unnumbered interfaces, though, for singly-connected customers
(unless their routers can't support unnumbered interfaces). The only
major gotcha with that is that if they're using a Real Router (that deleted
routes associated with interfaces that aren't available), you can't
get to their router if their ethernet is down...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -