Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: sell shell accounts?

  • From: Brett D. Watson
  • Date: Sat Jul 20 04:27:02 1996

> > Acceptable arguments are:
> 
> > o Switches can handle more throughput
> 
> That's difficult to quantify in theory *or* practice.
> 
> > o Switched networks are easier for humans (or at least, humans without
> >   huge brians && many internal registers) to design/debug/maintain.
> 
> More levels of indirection does not mean it's easier for humans necessarily.
> In fact, there are many more nobs to miss, and more places for error to
> be introduced into your engineering model.

  i would agree strongly.  putting a bunch of switches between two routers 
makes troubleshooting that much more involved.  if i can't get a packet from 
router A to router F (assuming B,C,D,and E are atm switches) where has the 
link broken down?  you have to go to each switch and look at incoming/outgoing 
cells to see which is not sending or receiving.   this scenario definately 
makes more work for the network operator doing the troubleshooting.  it 
certainly doesn't make things *easier*.

-brett

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.