North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: hostname anecdotes
- From: Tim Salo
- Date: Wed Jul 03 00:44:26 1996
> From: Alan Hannan <email@example.com>
> Subject: hostname anecdotes
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 21:51:32 -0500 (CDT)
> I'm not certain that the hostname anecdotes are terribly relevant
> to the operation of north american networks.
> Perhaps the discussion could be more well suited in big internet?
It might be useful for NANOG to discuss what involvement NANOG and ISPs
ought to have with these schemes.
o Should, for example, NANOG agree that ISPs ought not provide
secondary name service for this sort of activity?
o Should NANOG agree that some sorts of domain name speculation are
good grounds to terminate a customer?
o Should NANOG decide that some other organization ought to
address these issues? (What ever happen to FARNET?)
- The courts?
- The Internic?
o Should NANOG stick to purely technical issues?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -