North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Address "portability"
- From: Paul Ferguson
- Date: Fri Apr 05 19:39:50 1996
At 06:39 PM 4/5/96 -0500, Justin W. Newton wrote:
>At 12:32 PM 4/5/96 -0800, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
>>The California PUC has approved local phone competition within California,
>>with the requirement the phone number portability (between carriers) be
>>fully implemented as soon as possible. Making your phone number stay the
>>same no matter whether you're a PacBell or MFS or TCI customer is exactly
>>the same problem as making IP addresses portable... just wait until ISPs
>>are regulated, and they get the same mandate.
>
>Uhm, Cisco, you hear that?
>
>
Um, and pray tell, what exactly is cisco supposed to do about this?
I'll write my congresscritter if you write yours. :-)
- paul
|
