North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: packet loss (was re: mae-west congestion)
- From: nicholas harteau
- Date: Sat Mar 23 14:03:44 1996
Peter Kaminski wrote:
> Matthew Kaufman writes about the Ames FDDI ring saturation:
> >What I don't understand is why that has _stayed_ saturated... it seems
> >to me that some of the big players would have rerouted their traffic
> >by now to avoid subjecting it to this, which would also have the side
> >effect of causing the problem to, at least for the short term, go
> ...or why MFS hasn't installed a Gigaswitch there, or whatever. We're
> seeing 20% - 30% packet loss through AGIS to MCI and Sprintlink during
> the day, and it's not fun.
Speaking of fddi rings, saturation, and packet loss.. has anyone taken
a look at the peering between mcinet and cicnet at the chicago nap?
i get about the same (20-30%) packet loss during the day.
and no, it's not fun at all.