Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Allocation of IP Addresses

  • From: Jim Fleming
  • Date: Thu Mar 14 23:31:12 1996

I think people are seeing the point...

As a clarification...IANA is at least two people...

	Jon (not John) Postel and Joyce Reynolds

$ whois 0.0.0.0
IANA (RESERVED-1)

   Netname: RESERVED
   Netnumber: 0.0.0.0

   Coordinator:
      Reynolds, Joyce K.  (JKR1)  JKRey@ISI.EDU
      (310) 822-1511

   Record last updated on 15-Jan-91.

Jim Fleming
Naperville, IL

P.S. I think IANA stands for "I Am Not Alone"

----------
From: 	Gordon Cook[SMTP:gcook@tigger.jvnc.net]
Sent: 	Thursday, March 14, 1996 2:20 PM
To: 	David R. Conrad
Cc: 	Jim Browning; 'com-priv list'; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: 	Re: Allocation of IP Addresses 

Just a small quibble David:  when you say "the IANA" decided, it gives 
the impression that an august group of people like the IESG took action.  
In reality "the IANA" is but a SINGLE person - John Postel.  If some 
people are upset I suspect it might be because the power to make such a 
decision is vested in the hands of ONE person rather than in a group.

*********************************************************************
Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher    Subscriptions: Individ-ascii   $85
The COOK Report on Internet                 Individ. hard copy   $150
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA       Small Corp & Gov't   $200
(609) 882-2572                              Corporate            $350
Internet: cook@cookreport.com               Corporate Site Lic.  $650
http://pobox.com/cook/  for new COOK Report Glossary of Internet terms 
*********************************************************************


On Fri, 15 Mar 1996, David R. Conrad wrote:

> It would appear a clarification is necesssary:
> 
> >>>The @Home allocation was done outside of normal registry procedures by
> >>>the IANA directly.  InterNIC should not be held responsible for that
> >>>case.
> >Which confirms that the rules are not well established nor consistently applied.
> 
> Any very large or unusual request must go outside normal registry
> procedures (e.g., slow start).  @Home is such a case.  They made their
> case directly to the IANA as InterNIC is not authorized to allocate
> very large or unusual requests directly.  The IANA authorized the
> allocation based on the merits of the request (whatever they might
> be).  None of the registries can allocate very large or unusual
> requests directly.  This rule is quite well established and
> consistently applied.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 







Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.