Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: larger space was: Re: [NIC-....

  • From: Paul Ferguson
  • Date: Thu Feb 15 18:04:38 1996

At 03:23 PM 2/15/96 -0500, Alan B. Clegg wrote:

>
>How exactly does a larger address space ease deployment of an ISP? 
>"Current thinking" of who?  Sure we should conserve space, but that was
>not my argument.  My argument is that small ISPs are *NOT* going to
>cooperate to get larger blocks.  They use any tactic to make themselves
>out to be 'larger fish' in that network bowl.  Ever seen a nasty catfight
>between small local ISPs?  I have.  Not pretty.  Cooperation?  Not likely. 
>

This is exactly the type of mentality that the address ownership
draft addresses, and without the word 'mandatory' appearing anywhere
in the text.

This attitude of non-cooperation is shameful. 

- paul





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.