North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
- From: Vadim Antonov
- Date: Mon Jan 29 22:50:30 1996
Well, i meant precisely the city loops which aren't multihomed,
and that's what customers are using to access telco facilities.
I.e. POTS customers (and their PBXes) aren't multihomed in the
sense used in the discussion.
The better term for telcos are doing for reliability between
switch sites is called "standby", which is *not* the same as
multihoming with adaptive routing.
The point was that high reliability may be achieved w/o tricky
things like adaptive routing,
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Mon Jan 29 21:14:22 1996
Received: from tiny.sprintlink.net (tiny.sprintlink.net [126.96.36.199]) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA09936 for <email@example.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 21:14:21 -0500
Received: from red.hex.net (firstname.lastname@example.org [188.8.131.52]) by tiny.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA14645 for <email@example.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 21:14:11 -0500
Received: (from sdenny@localhost) by red.hex.net (8.6.10/8.6.10) id UAA02836; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 20:14:00 -0600
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Stephen Denny)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 20:14:00 -0600
In-Reply-To: Vadim Antonov <email@example.com>
"Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations" (Jan 29, 4:19pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Vadim Antonov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
On Jan 29, 4:19pm, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> Note that regular telephone service does not generally employ multihoming
> and dynamic adaptive routing, but has a lot better reliability. Something
> to think about.
}-- End of excerpt from Vadim Antonov
Regular telephone service is indeed generally multihomed except for the
final loop from the central office.
SS7 is a major pain partly because of the multiple routes it supports.
- Multiple links in linksets (partly for capacity, partly for reliability)
- Multiple linksets in routesets, where each linkset terminates on a
Typically the CO is "multihomed" to two mated STPs for signaling traffic,
and user traffic is routed through multiple tandems based on load,
availability, cost and destination. Of course SCPs are also deployed in
pairs. All this is in addition to the redundancy built into each piece
of equipment, or the underlying transport (e.g. sonet). Of course none
of this stuff comes for the price of a Cisco router either.
What *is* true is that the telephone network is more or less a static
network in terms of routing (although becoming less so). It would be
big news indeed if a new CO just popped onto the network and started
This "static routing" idea makes for ultimate control and predictability
even with multiple routes.
Stephen Denny email@example.com
Member of the Technical Staff, Hex.Net Superhighway