Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: value of co-location

  • From: Dennis Ferguson
  • Date: Fri Jan 19 15:26:21 1996

From: "George H. Clapp" <clapp@bellcore.com>

> I'm also curious about the value of co-location.  Using a fast packet
> service (Frame Relay, SMDS, or ATM) allows your on-site router to
> communicate directly with a router of another ISP.  There's no need to
> purchase another router to place at the co-location site.  Why incur the
> additional cost?

To avoid having to use any of the fast packet services you mentioned?
Or to allow you to use routers, which you know about, instead of being
dependent on the random characteristics of switches the telephone
company bought?

Not using either of the last two fast packet services, in particular, will
also yield 30% more useful bandwidth from a T3 circuit.  This all by itself
may make up for the co-location costs and the cost of a router.

Dennis Ferguson




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.