North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Not to beat a dead horse
- From: Curtis Villamizar
- Date: Fri Dec 22 00:07:50 1995
In message <199512190336.WAA10374@netaxs.com>, Avi Freedman writes:
> But I still see 4 /24s advertised in 208/8:
> Now, besides the fact that 126.96.36.199 & 188.8.131.52 could be 184.108.40.206/23
> (grin), what IS the appropriate way to deal with an ongoing situation
> where un-NIC-allocated IP space is advertised on the Internet?
> We have no plans to implement incoming route filters on 208/8 - who
> knows when the NIC will start allocating out of it.
> Obviously, having announcements of unallocated address space "work" for
> the long term is a bad precedent to set. Yes, it can be a pain to deal
> with the NIC (which is following policies approved of by most NSPs)
> to get address space, but ...
These are not registered in the IRR so ANS won't route to them.