Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Links on the blink - what will/should mci & sprint do?

  • From: Curtis Villamizar
  • Date: Mon Nov 20 15:21:10 1995

In message <Pine.SUN.3.91.951118235535.11322D-100000@tigger.jvnc.net>, Gordon C
ook writes:
> Sean writes:
> 
> Thirdly, there are some very cunning
> ideas being proposed by various hardware people for making
> the 7500 do interesting things on the switching front that
> very probably will get the router to deal with the kinds of
> loads you're asking about.
> 
> COOK:  does this mean that there is some way to get the cisco to behave 
> like the cascade switch I asked about??  If not what in general does it mean?
> 
> Finally you said if the 7500 doesn't perform well then you might have to 
> do the redesign I asked about.... meaning going to an atm switched 
> backbone with routers at the periphery of the backbone??
> 
> ********************************************************************
> Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher       Subscript.: Individ-ascii  $85
> The COOK Report on Internet                Non Profit.          $150
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618          Small Corp & Gov't   $200
> (609) 882-2572                             Corporate            $350
> Internet: cook@cookreport.com              Corporate. Site Lic  $650
Newly expanded COOK Report Web Pages http://pobox.com/cook/
> ********************************************************************


We are bound by non-disclosure to limit what we say about future
products of the vendors we have chosen for final evaluation.  I don't
think it is any big secret that vendors do have new products in the
works.  IMO- the so called "wall" is not a problem but you need some
heftier routers than what is commonly used today.

I don't like the idea of going into a layer 2 and letting layer 2 deal
with it.  You can probably build a working network either way.
Equipment cost per port is not our highest priority, it is secondary.
Stability and low loss in our backbone is a very high priority.  That
says a lot about why the technology we ar looking at is different than
PSI, Alternet, and Netcom (and maybe a bit different than Sprint too).
ANS charges more for a reason.

Curtis




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.