North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES
- From: Dave McGuire
- Date: Fri Jul 28 17:05:02 1995
On July 28, you wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 95 09:19:42 PDT
>> From: "Roy Engehausen" <email@example.com>
>> Just a lurker normally but how about using product/services as a
>> qualifer? Examples: ibm.computers.com att.telephone.com
>> specialized.bicycles.com cisco.networks.com?
> I like this one! It not only deepens the name space but can provide
> some additional (read "advertising") to the user, making it an easier
> proposal to sell.
> For example, I would not want to loose ior.com, but I would be more
> willing to use ior.isp.com than ior.spk.wa.us (geographic).
> It shouldn't be too difficult to have your company listed under
> multiple product/service categories if your company covers more than
I too am normally a lurker here...but I would have to agree. It
also makes certain real-world situations easier. Things like
"Mr. Sysadmin? You know the Internet real well, right? Can you help
me find information on bicycles?" become much easier with a
descriptive hierarchy like this. I like it.
-Dave McGuire, Systems
Digital Express Group, Incorporated