North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
- From: Kevin Oberman
- Date: Thu Jul 27 13:10:57 1995
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 07:42:05 -0700
> From: Paul A Vixie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I already know that U.S. companies put under states are going to feel
> overspecified. I can already hear the reasons why IBM.COM.NY.US is
> supposedly "wrong" since IBM is a nationwide, no, worldwide company.
> On the other hand they're incorporated in New York and the point isn't
> to have the name make sense, it's to keep the hierarchy from flattening.
To make matters far worse, a very disproportionate number of
corporations are "located" in Delaware for legal and tax reasons, even
if they only have a small office in that state. Whoever is responsible
for DE will have a very big job! And think of all the traffic that
will cross teh pond because people forget the ".US"!
I think Paul is right on the mark on this one.
R. Kevin Oberman
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
National Energy Research Supercomputer Center (NERSC)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
EMAIL: email@example.com Phone: +1 510 422-6955