North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
- From: Karl Denninger, MCSNet
- Date: Fri Apr 28 11:28:29 1995
> The equipment available today is designed foolishly --
> route update processing and actual packet processing should NEVER be done by
> the same CPU -- but it is -- and as such you're dead when this happens.
> Lest anyone believe this, it's bullshit.
> Karl just buys low end gear and then complains because it's not high
> end gear.
I suppose that a 7000 with a SSP is considered "low end" gear then?
It was *Vadim* who was complaining about CPU usage on your boxes, not me.
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | (shell, PPP, SLIP, leased) in Chicagoland
Voice: [+1 312 248-8649] | 7 POPs online through Chicago, all 28.8
Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | Email to "firstname.lastname@example.org" for more information
ISDN: Surf at Smokin' Speed | WWW: http://www.mcs.net, gopher: gopher.mcs.net