North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: SF NAP status
- From: Stan Barber
- Date: Fri Nov 11 21:29:56 1994
Gordon, I think that question might be better directed at Sprint.
On Nov 11, 9:19pm, Gordon Cook wrote:
} Subject: Re: SF NAP status
} Two things seem strange. Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting to
} the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? Why
} is sprint late?
}
} 2nd question: for those of us outside of california...what the heck is
} the PUC thing all about?
}
}
}
} ********************************************************************
} Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscr.: Individ $85
} The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN Non Prof., Gov't &
} 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 Small Corp $175
} (609) 882-2572 Corp. Site Lic $500
} Internet: gcook@tigger.jvnc.net Monthly policy & tech news
} ********************************************************************
}
}
}-- End of excerpt from Gordon Cook
--
Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: bcm!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
