Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Comments

  • From: Peter S. Ford
  • Date: Mon Sep 05 17:59:33 1994

>>> I knew the truth about NAPS would come out.
>>>  
>>> The idea is to squeeze out the small US players and force them to 
>>> pay the DS3 capable telcos for their access.
>>>  
>>> Is this anti-competative or what!
>>>  
>>> I'm glad I don't operate in the US

Peter,

It was never the intent for the NAPs to cover all inter-connectivity
requirements.  When the NAPs were first being considered it was assumed
from day one that the CIX and other interconnects would continue to exist.
As such, there is not a requirement for "small US players" to directly
connect to a NAP.  Many have pointed out that there are alternate means
to get the connectivity they need, and alternatively it appears that
many of the NAPs offer lower than DS-3 speed connectivity.

Given your premises are not quite sound, it would appear that 
"Is this anti-competative or what!" can be answered to the 
negative.

cheers, peter
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.