North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Jessica Yu
- Date: Tue Aug 30 11:44:39 1994
>Perhaps. My biggest concern was that the Merit paper would be construed as
>the -only- way an ATM NAP would work. They clearly did not indicate there
>were potential choices nor did they indicate the assumptions that were made
>for their test.
Bill, now I doubt if you read the paper carefully or not.
First of all, this paper does not design the ATM-NAP architecture BUT is a
ROUTING DESIGN for the planned ATM-NAP architecture. Please don't confuse
these two different issues.
For the planned ATM-NAP architecture (i.e. RFC1490/AAL5) with the current
availability of the RS's (i.e. SUN) ATM interface product, what other choices
do we have to connect the RS and do NAP routing at this time frame?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -