NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] default routes question or any way to do therebundant
- From: Pete Templin
- Date: Thu Mar 20 20:14:33 2008
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> By charter nothing is off-topic on -futures, but that doesn't mean the
> current content is not a ridiculous waste of time.
BS. This is relevant discussion - there are numerous other fora out
there, and there's constant discussion about what NANOG's borders should
be. I for one was told to screw off when I tried to discuss whether
European packets were on topic, and I'm getting tired of people not
being willing to define what NANOG is and isn't.
For the record, it's my opinion that configuration guidance for a single
router that's likely not running a single dynamic routing protocol is
fodder for other resources.
pt
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
|
