NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] Mailing list procedures for review by the NANOGcommunity
- From: Adam Rothschild
- Date: Mon Mar 03 00:35:21 2008
On 2008-03-02-18:05:11, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks, I'm seeking some commentary on the following document that may
> help us to make incremental improvements in the operation of the
> mailing list.
>
> http://www.fugawi.net/~hannigan/nanog-mlcp1-1.pdf
For those of us following along at home, could you please explain the
differences between this policy and what was presented in San Jose[1],
if any? Is this PDF something put together by the MLC for community
review, or something more casual in nature?
Perhaps a bit disturbing is the part about permanently suspending a
disruptive sender's posting privileges. I think I'd rather this
remain a 6 (12?) month deal, even if it means you'll need to go
through the motions to habitually "re-ban" some folk.
In any event, I appreciate your putting this together in coherent
written form and getting the dialogue going.
-a
[1] http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0802/presentations/community-pilosov.pdf
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
|
