NANOG-futures

[Martin Hannigan]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> Stephen Wilcox wrote:
>
>  >> Assign right of review to the sc without guidelines as to when or how
>  >> review might occur.
>  >
>  > yes altho i would make sure that review occurs periodically.. these
>  > things are highly unusual (1 person in all these years) so i don't
>  > think it hurts to keep things in the discussion every few months. i
>  > was on that MLC and was disappointed it had to be that way
>   >
>  > you may even want to try unbanning some time just to test the water,
>  > that would seem to be within the spirit of things, no?
>
>  I would think that the basis for reconsidering an indefinite ban as the
>  individual having suitably rehabilitated themselves in the eyes
>  community. A ban should not be punishment for past misdeeds, rather a
>  preclusion from future ones.
>
>  The idea of a general amnesty at key inflection points is not a bad one.
>  But revolutionaries can decide on their own whether throwing open the
>  doors of the bastille is a good idea or not.
>

I'm not proposing that Dean come back. He's incorrigable. We need to
provide a method to allow for what we've done and to allow the SC to
do what they do. House cleaning. In the procedures doc that I am about
to post after I get initial thoughts on a few nagging questions, I
address just that and define a procedure that has a permanent ban
being "recommended" by the MLC but enacted upon by the SC. Blah blah
blah. Etc.

-M<

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures