NANOG-futures

[Joel Jaeggli]

Stephen Wilcox wrote:

>> Assign right of review to the sc without guidelines as to when or how
>> review might occur.
> 
> yes altho i would make sure that review occurs periodically.. these  
> things are highly unusual (1 person in all these years) so i don't  
> think it hurts to keep things in the discussion every few months. i  
> was on that MLC and was disappointed it had to be that way
 >
> you may even want to try unbanning some time just to test the water,  
> that would seem to be within the spirit of things, no?

I would think that the basis for reconsidering an indefinite ban as the 
individual having suitably rehabilitated themselves in the eyes 
community. A ban should not be punishment for past misdeeds, rather a 
preclusion from future ones.

The idea of a general amnesty at key inflection points is not a bad one. 
But revolutionaries can decide on their own whether throwing open the 
doors of the bastille is a good idea or not.

> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures@nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
> 


_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures