NANOG-futures

[Joel Jaeggli]

Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Do folks think that we ought to do a charter amendment to allow for
> permanent bans? That seems like a huge issue and that we may want to
> get an up or down vote. The way we would address it is either adding
> it as a "power" of the MLC, or even the SC -- then right a non charter
> procedure to develop "the how".
> 
> We have one person banned "for life and a day" and we don't seem to
> have a way to address that. We addressed it in v.01 of the MLC where
> we wanted the decks cleared of bans and added everyone back in, but
> then we were forced to "re-ban" said miscreant.
> 
> Please advise.

I would do two things:

characterize it as indefinite rather than permanent.

Assign right of review to the sc without guidelines as to when or how 
review might occur.


> Marty (MLC)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures@nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
> 


_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures