NANOG-futures

[Ren Provo]

We consider the surveys, in addition to mailing list and hallway discussions.

 

A rough cut from SJC was made available during the NANOG PC call this week but should be posted soon for NANOG42.

 

Previous survey material -

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/surveyresults.html

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0706/surveyresults.html
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0702/surveyresults.html

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0610/nanog38_suvey_results.html

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/surveys/

etc.

 

Cheers, -ren

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:

Joel spewed:

>I think it would be remiss of the pc to not review the status of
>program elements. That would be an abrogation of the >responsibility
invested the pc by the charter.

>Further I believe that PC review of a popular and successful >program
element would be with the goal of helping it grow.


Can we see the procedure that you're going to make up to do this first?

-M<

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures