NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?
- From: David Barak
- Date: Wed Feb 27 22:50:35 2008
--- On Wed, 2/27/08, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Further I believe that PC review of a popular and
> successful >program
> element would be with the goal of helping it grow.
>
>
> Can we see the procedure that you're going to make up
> to do this first?
I'm not sure that pre-defining procedures of this type is helpful. Given that the general consensus is that the peering BOFs are successful and popular now, it's reasonable to expect that the PC has no desire to radically change things - this isn't in need of a serious overhaul. I suspect that writing procedures for a review of this nature would be harder than performing said review.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
|
