NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] level of fail [was: The Peering BOF and theFallout?]
- From: David Barak
- Date: Tue Feb 26 02:07:58 2008
--- On Tue, 2/26/08, vijay gill <vgill@vijaygill.com> wrote:
> > > Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort
> of overtly structured
> > > environment would make it boring and not as
> useful, which is bad.
> >
> >
> > then i suggest you not do it!
>
>
>
> I am very against any such action. I wish to state for the
> record that I do
> NOT want oversight of the bof, the very spontaneity is what
> brings out the
> true value for me
This is the most violent agreement I've ever seen.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
|
