NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [Nanog-futures] level of fail [was: The Peering BOF and theFallout?]
- From: Randy Bush
- Date: Tue Feb 26 01:12:03 2008
vijay gill wrote:
> On 2/25/08, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort of overtly structured
>>> environment would make it boring and not as useful, which is bad.
>> then i suggest you not do it!
> I am very against any such action. I wish to state for the record that I do
> NOT want oversight of the bof, the very spontaneity is what brings out the
> true value for me
i am very against you beating your wife. i wish to state for the record ...
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
|
