NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Topicality and audiences [was Re: tech support being flooded due to IE 0day]
- From: Patrick W. Gilmore
- Date: Mon Sep 25 08:53:34 2006
On Sep 24, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Cat Okita wrote:
I tend to think of the two in crude terms as:
NANOG = where are my packets going
inet-access = what to do with packets on departure/arrival
There's obviously some overlap, but as a crude way to think about
where
an issue should be posted, it works reasonably well.
Let's be careful about defining other lists on nanog-futures.
More specifically, lots of people on inet-access are happy to discuss
"where are my packets going". And, just to show that nothing ever
stays the same, please note that the S:N on inet-access is many
orders of magnitude better than NANOG these days. Oh, and the
posting volume is much lower. (Think back to mid-90s and tell me if
you ever thought you could say the previous two sentences with a
straight face.)
--
TTFN,
patrick
|