NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: A possible compromise?
- From: Michael.Dillon
- Date: Mon Sep 25 05:19:50 2006
> My humble suggestion is that we start to forbid on-list meta-debate
> on what is on-topic or not, and keep it here, and that THAT is more
> enforce than today. Just look at the silly amount of mails sent out
> bickering about what is on-topic or not, compared to the actual
> original mails?
Let's see, the solution to off-topic botnet postings
is to set up another list where botnets are on topic.
So if we set up a separate list called NANOG-FUTURES
then all metadiscussions will go there, right?
Maybe we should ban anyone from NANOG posting for
a month if they post complaints about on-topic
content to the main NANOG list.
--Michael Dillon
P.S. tongue in cheek really. I know that the
whole issue will only settle down once people
can see a list of what is considered on-topic
or not.
|
