NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Finally, common ground
- From: Joe Provo
- Date: Sun Sep 24 13:01:57 2006
[Don't know if you're on futures or not Gadi, please if you are
don't both with the 'courtesy cc' back to me.]
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:04:23AM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> > On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> >
> > > Great. What is appropriate for NANOG?
Part of the evolution/changes were about being less "prohibitive"
in this realm. That still does not change it to an open-ending,
"anything goes" realm. It is really as simple as Mr Underwood has
described it.
Official FAQ: http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html#topics
Appropriate Topics
NANOG discussions are on-topic if they're of interest to people
running wide-area networks interconnected with other networks.
"Network operations" in this context means issues related to
entire networks, rather than to end users.
Appropriate topics include routing, broad-based engineering
problems/issues/solutions, outages, performance measurement,
evolving wide-area technologies, exchange points, traffic
engineering, operational experience, ISP security, and trouble
ticket systems.
FAQ Wiki: http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/The_NANOG_Mailing_List
Relevant Items
* Router questions
* Routing protocols and other Layer4 denizens
* Network Operation matters
* Network Management Tools and Issues
* Peering and Interconnections
* Billing and Accounting
Not So Relevant Items
* NANOG organization and meta-topics
* Dead horses and tired topics
* End User Issues
* Stuff totally out in left field
* Stuff that is only sometimes relevant
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
|
