NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Topicality and audiences [was Re: tech support being flooded due to IE 0day]
- From: Todd Underwood
- Date: Sun Sep 24 12:12:31 2006
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:58:11AM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Pete Templin wrote:
> > Gadi Evron wrote:
> >
> > > So, is NANOG only for transit ISPs?
> >
> > No. Stop trying to spin things. NANOG is, in my opinion, based on its
> > history, a resource for the network monkeys. If that's a team of folks
> > at a transit ISP, that's what it's for. If that's a time slice of what
> > the tech guy at <mom and pop ISP> does, it's his resource for that.
> >
> > Those who wear multiple hats can subscribe to multiple lists. I wear
> > very few hats, but subscribe to several lists, knowing that not all of
> > the postings I'd like to make are appropriate for NANOG.
>
> Great. What is appropriate for NANOG?
>
topics related to network engineering.
network.
engineering.
optionally, something about north american network engineering.
bots? only if they either:
1) run on network hardware (would be truly interesting)
or
2) affect the proper operation of the network (slammer, for example).
see? that's not hard.
t.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever
believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
--Richard Dawkins, "A Devil's Chaplain"
|
