NANOG-futures

[Gadi Evron]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Pete Templin wrote:
> Gadi Evron wrote:
> 
> > As it is on topic, and operational, to ISP's. It is of interest to many
> > NANOGers.
> 
> Whoa.  Time out.  The question is not whether it's operational to ISPs 
> (in the general sense, covering small to large, hosting, dial-access, 
> DSL, leased-line, you-name-it providers), the question is whether it's 
> operational to the network operations staff and management.  You know, 
> the folks who try not to touch the routers for fear they'll laugh back.
> 
> My employer has two DNS servers for customer consumption and three 
> monitoring servers for internal use.  There are no other servers under 
> our control reachable to customers.  We don't handle any end-user PCs. 
> Therefore, I don't want to hear about end-user and/or server issues, 
> whatsoever.  I came to NANOG for _network_ (i.e. not _systems_) 
> awareness, and that's what I'm hoping it'll get back to, once you and 
> others stop polluting the list.

So, is NANOG only for transit ISPs?

	Gadi.

> 
> pt
>