NANOG-futures

[Gadi Evron]

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:15 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> 
> > But even more than pointing out an issue with Gadi in particular, this
> > points out the need for mailing list administration which is not  
> > impotent
> > in these issues. The existing MLC can't take any necessary action  
> > other
> > than asking nicely (which they've already done several times) without
> > invoking the micromanaging of everyone with an opinion about Gadi's  
> > post.
> 
> Gadi claims he was only asked once by the MLC to stop posted, and  
> that was about DNS issues, which were declared "on-topic" by a post  
> to the list from the MLC the next day.  (His story, I didn't - and  
> can't - verify it.)
> 
> Does this mean he is on-topic?  Hell no.  (I've already expressed my  
> view on this.)  But I have to admit, the way Gadi spins it, the MLC  
> is not making him feel like he is doing anything wrong.
> 
> Of course, the 100s of posts from non-MLC members should have  
> probably had an affect by now.

50 of which are from you?

I will answer every single email until this this resolved. No
misunderstandings will remain.

This is what nanog-futures is for, no? Let's put an end to this.

> 
> -- 
> TTFN,
> patrick
> 
>