NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: press photography
- From: William B. Norton
- Date: Wed Jun 14 19:46:06 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aaBeuKcpORdt3ss1jjhdYilB9uXbgAD6Re3bRnloiBUFQNEj7amI0Dxq8fLpQ6qjLSl1dJ0R07yKXwGD5R4Z2Bo/yySpiHWuzIEzjZBIYSxh6CBp0pcL8uoGAUrwP+hrrf72IvueVOWfVYf2BZVJ8AOTwXCHyetuiqJ9miAjx8c=
if you bothered to actually read my message, the bottom line is
that we can't ban it. i apologize if actually trying to find out
the rules of the game as opposed to just pontificating offended
you.
Cool - maybe we agree and there is no issue at all then. Do we agree
that photography should be allowed without restriction at NANOG
meetings as it was before the San Jose NANOG? That the request made by
Steve Feldman on the podium on Merit's behalf was a one-time fluke and
we need no rules at this time regarding photography at NANOG.
If I stated that accurately then I'll shut up.
That was the outcome I was hoping for!
Bill
| 
