NANOG-futures
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: press photography
- From: William B. Norton
- Date: Wed Jun 14 19:26:04 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GsKFRHK8AepT5VJUP4LZMrJOb++ZrLiqf7mv9f9+mN38ezdkQ3j4/f/6UhIboTy9ZRUQ2TcIpVM/paVwCED4tpqdSVUVQxJfNJG/HBuQa/r0HNos7uTQKKIec3pEqDUK8SrG2ZPY5ymBRpROLvO/icf58MqqOmtuqnpzxe4IvUI=
On 6/14/06, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> Should there be a rule at NANOG limiting or preventing the taking of
> photographs in the main meeting room?
interesting that you propose this. why? i did not realize you
were so opposed to photography.
I don't propose. I ask the question.
The fork in the road is
A) photography rule or
B) no photography rule.
It used to be B - take photos at your leasure.
In San Jose it seemed to become A because of a fear the press would
put our photographs in the main stream press.
I believe, without emirical evidence that things have gone awry, the
NANOG community would prefer not to have any more rules than
necessary. But that is what this discussion should find out.
Bill
| 
