Merit Joint Technical Staff
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Competition for Dial-In Lines
- From: Jeff.Ogden
- Date: Sat Aug 22 10:47:22 1992
FYI
---(Forwarded from: RMCREEDY@CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU, Dated: Sat, 22 Aug 92 01:54:16 EDT)---
Received: from CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU by um.cc.umich.edu via Internet with TCP; Sat, 22 Aug 92 01:52:27 EDT
Received: from CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU by CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 7485; Sat, 22 Aug 92 01:54:20 EDT
Received: from WAYNEST1 (RMCREEDY) by CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU (Mailer R2.04) with
BSMTP id 8639; Sat, 22 Aug 92 01:54:19 EDT
Comments: Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 01:54:17 EDT
From: <RMCREEDY@CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU>
Subject: Competition for Dial-In Lines
In-Reply-To: note of 08/21/92 20:00
To: <Jeff.Ogden@um.cc.umich.edu>
The only comment I'd have on your suggestion for different restricted/
unrestricted hunt groups is that it would make the assortment of dialup
facilities "officially" supported by MichNet sites even more varied and
confusing to the end user. Aside from advertising Michnet *and* MiBell
numbers, just within the MichNet numbers we'd be offering....
- low-speed dialups (2400 or below) that may or may not multispeed
(Detroit 2400 lines are 2400-only...other Detroit-area 2400's multispeed)
- 9600 lines that may or may not have compression/correciton enabled
- 9600 lines that may or may not multispeed
- 9600 lines that may or may not have idle-time restrictions
Do we really want to do that to people?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
