IRRd-Discuss
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: inet6num supported completely?
- From: William F. Maton
- Date: Thu Oct 18 12:57:14 2001
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
> Yes, the release announcement was misleading. While the IRRd
> daemon now supports inet6num objects, the irr_submit/irr_check programs
> have not yet been updated to support this object. Sorry about the
> confusion.
OK, thanks Larry.
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > I noticed in the release announcement for irrd 2.1, that the
> > inet6num object was supported (by you didn't need IPv6 in the kernel).
> > Just for the sake of trying, I decided to try inserted a record with an
> > inet6num:
> >
> > inet6num:<?> 2001:0410:04::0/40
> > netname: CRC-IPv6
> > descr: NLA allocation from CANARIE
> > country: CA
> > admin-c: WFM-ARIN
> > tech-c: WFM-ARIN
> > notify: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca
> > mnt-by: MAINT-AS818
> > changed: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca 20010927
> > source: CRC
> > #ERROR: 1: ?: Unrecognized class type
> > #ERROR: 1: ?: Illegal or unrecognized attribute "inet6num"
> > #ERROR: No key field specified
> >
> > ----
> >
> > And voila. Is the inet6num: object not yet supported? Did I misread the
> > announcement's feature list? I am using 2.1.2 under linux i686, kernel
> > 2.2.19.
> >
> > tx.
> >
> > wfms
>
wfms
|
