IRRd-Discuss

[SEGUIN, RONALD]

Thanks guys for the help.  My compilation of IRRd2.0 went a little 
further after installing FLEX.

However encountered the following error, any ideas?

Linking: gcc -L/usr/local/lib lex.yy.o rpsl.tab.o irr_attrs.o prefix.o util.o
syntax_attrs.o canonical.o hdr_build.o dictionary.o main.o  -o irr_check -L../hdr_comm
-lhdrs -L../pgp -lpgp
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
pgp_fingerpr                        syntax_attrs.o
pgp_add                             syntax_attrs.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to irr_check
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `irr_check'
Current working directory /usr/local/pkgs/irrd2.0/src/programs/irr_rpsl_check
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `make-programs'
Current working directory /usr/local/pkgs/irrd2.0/src/programs
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `program'
Current working directory /usr/local/pkgs/irrd2.0/src
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all'


--regards

Gerald Andrew Winters wrote:
> 
> 
> > > Has anyone encountered these types of errors when trying to compile IRRd2.0
> > > on Solaris.  If so, how was it rectified???
> >
> > I had problems compiling, but not at that exact spot.
> >
> > > cd irr_rpsl_check; make
> > > /usr/local/bin/bison -v -d rpsl.y
> > > rpsl.y contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
> > > lex rpsl.fl
> >   ^^^
> >
> > You might try installing GNU flex and seeing if that helps.
> >
> > I've attached a file that contains the configure and make output from
> > compiling the contents of irrd-1.9-Jul-30.2000.tar.gz. This
> > compilation was done on a highly customized version of Redhat
> > 6.1. I've been able to compile and use a previous version of IRRd that
> > was released in a tarball called irrd2.0.tar.gz and that I downloaded
> > on Jul 21.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> 
> Jeff is correct.  You need flex and bison, lex and yacc will not work.
> 
> I'm sorry for not making this point clear before.  However, flex and
> bison are very easy to build and I should not think you will have
> any more problems.
> 
> One thing this discussion points out is that we need to have autoconf
> tell the user of this dependency during the build phase.  I'll make
> sure this is remedied in the next release.
> 
> --jerry

-- 
*********************************
Ron Seguin
IP Engineering
Bell Nexxia

(613)781-2555 (voice)
(613)780-1761 (pgr)
(613)781-1453 (fax)
ronald.seguin@bellnexxia.com
*********************************