Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

IRRd-Discuss


Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IRRD Query Commands

  • From: Judy Yu
  • Date: Tue Oct 26 12:08:49 1999

Hello Jerry,

Right now I only need to get the routes with a specific maintainer to build
ACL for our multihomed customers. But I do agree with you that a more generic
one would be nicer.

Thanks.


Gerald Andrew Winters wrote:

> Hello Judy,
>
> You are correct that there is currently no command to return
> all routes with a specified maintainer.  I agree with you that this
> command would be very useful.  In fact, it would be nice to have
> a command which could return all objects with a specified maintainer
> with the ability to specify certain objects (such as routes only).
>
> So do you need the route objects only or are you interested in
> all objects with a specific maintainer?
>
> As you know we are busy for the present time but should have
> time to add such a command in the latter half of november.
> Something might be able to be done earlier but with the transition
> to rpsl I cannot make any promises.
>
> --jerry
>
> >
> > This is Judy Yu from Cable & Wireless and we are in the process of
> > testing and using IRRD. In  the IRRD user/configuration guide I could
> > find most of the commands I need to use such as !gas1234(Get routes with
> > specified origin). But I can't find anything let you get routes with
> > specified maintainer and we really need this one. I wonder if you have
> > anything available or if you are considering write one.
> >
> > Please respond to jyu@cw.net
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Judy Yu
> > Internet Engineering
> > Cable & Wireless USA
> > ph. 703-292-2448 Email jyu@cw.net
> >
> >
> >
> >

--
Judy Yu
Internet Engineering
Cable & Wireless USA
ph. 703-292-2448






[an error occurred while processing this directive]