IRRd-Discuss
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: database inconsistencies?
- From: Steffen Baur
- Date: Thu Oct 21 03:05:05 1999
Dear Colleagues,
the 145.253.0.0/16 AS1275 route object at C&W RR was a remnant from
old days when iMCI claimed that all route objects has to be registered
at their RR, too. We didn't notice the route object up to now since
RIPE doesn't mirror CW.
We've deleted the route object a few minutes ago and checked that no
other route object of AS1275 is registered at CW. No further action
for RA is necessary (I presume). I might be an option that RIPE would
mirror CW, too.
Sorry for the inconvenience
Steffen Baur, DFN-NOC
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 08:26:00AM +0200, Jens-S. Voeckler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a local irrd to mirror the RA provided databases:
>
> IRRd> show database
> Listening on port 43 (fd=18)
> Memory-only indexing
> RIPE181 Syntax
>
> Database Size (kb) Rt Obj AutNum Obj Serial #
> --------- -------- ------ --------- ---------
> ans 4964.4 10561 26 37592
> canet 1095.5 9629 59 0
> mci 7516.6 47656 562 0
> radb 12948.8 55031 1994 75127
> ripe 5939.2 21165 2612 6530703
>
> ans
> Mirroring 198.108.0.11:43 (Next in 21:40:30)
> Never mirrored
> Next dbclean in 45:15:57
> canet
> Last loaded 04:32:20 10/21/99
> mci
> Last loaded 04:32:23 10/21/99
> radb
> Mirroring 198.108.0.11:43 (Next in 21:40:28)
> Never mirrored
> Next dbclean in 44:31:52
> ripe
> Mirroring 198.108.0.11:43 (Next in 21:39:47)
> Never mirrored
> Next dbclean in 45:13:46
>
> Since my Squid web cache software uses AS based ACLs and request routing,
> I rely on the correct information in the databases. Strangely enough,
> there seems to be a mixup concerning 145.253.0.0/16..18. Squid reports
> (verified by querying RA):
>
> > ]>
> > ]> 145.253.0.0/18 3211
> > ]> 145.253.0.0/16 1275
>
> The AS1275 NOC claims that 145.253.0.0/16 does not belong to AS1275. RIPE
> does report the network correctly to belong to AS3211. But when querying
> RA (and my local mirror), it also claims that CW says the network belongs
> to AS1275, even though it falls into the RIPE domain:
>
> $ whois -h whois.ripe.net 145.253.67.0
> [...]
> route: 145.253.0.0/16
> descr: ARCOR-IP
> origin: AS3209
> [...]
>
> $ whois -h whois.ripe.net 145.253.0.0
> [...]
> route: 145.253.0.0/18
> descr: ARCOR-IP
> origin: AS3211
> [...]
>
> $ whois -h whois.ra.net. 145.253.0.0
> [...]
> route: 145.253.0.0/18
> descr: ARCOR-IP
> origin: AS3211
> notify: markus.hies@arcor.net
> mnt-by: ARCOR-MNT
> changed: markus.hies@ripe.net 19980806
> changed: markus.hies@arcor.net 19981013
> source: RIPE
>
> route: 145.253.0.0/16
> descr: ARCOR-IP
> origin: AS1275 <-- this is the start of wrong information
> mnt-by: DFN-MNT
> changed: poldi@dfn.de 980422
> source: CW
>
> Who does resolve such inconsistencies?
>
> Yours
> Dipl.-Ing. Jens-S. Vöckler (voeckler@rvs.uni-hannover.de)
> Institute for Computer Networks and Distributed Systems
> University of Hanover, Germany; +49 511 762 4726
>
>
--
## Network Operation Center, DFN-Verein Geschaeftsstelle Stuttgart ##
## http://www.noc.dfn.de/ finger trouble@noc.dfn.de wartung@noc.dfn.de ##
## >>>>>> mailto: noc@noc.dfn.de <<<<<< ##
## Phone: 0711-63314-112, FAX 0711-63314-133 (business hours) ##
|
