Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

erate

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical E-Rate Central News for the Week of October 12, 2009

  • From: Hurley, Jeannene (MDE)
  • Date: Tue Oct 13 08:34:58 2009



·         FY 2008 and FY 2009 Funding Status

·         SLD Fall E-Rate Training: Part 3 — Pre-Commitment Corrections

·         E-Rate Updates and Reminders

·         Schools and Libraries News Brief dated October 9th — October Deadlines

 

The E-Rate Central News for the Week is prepared by E-Rate Central.  E-Rate Central specializes in providing consulting, compliance, and forms processing services to E-rate applicants.  Additional E-rate information is located on the E‑Rate Central Web site (http://www.e‑ratecentral.com).  To learn more about our services, please contact us by phone (516-801-7804) or through our Contact Us Web form (http://www.e-ratecentral.com/contactUs/contactForm.asp). 

 

FY 2008 and FY 2009 Funding Status

 

Wave 23 is scheduled for release on October 13th for $69 million.  This brings cumulative FY 2009 funding to $1.11 billion.  Priority 2 funding is still being provided for discounts of only 85% or more, but may ultimately be available at or below 80%.

 

Wave 69 for FY 2008 will be released on October 14th for an undisclosed amount; the cumulative funding year total is currently $2.34 billion.  Priority 2 funding at 87% is still pending.

 

SLD Fall E-Rate Training: Part 3 — Pre-Commitment Corrections

 

This is the third in a series of articles discussing important aspects of this fall’s SLD E‑rate training presentations.  As noted below, copies of all slides used in this training are available on the SLD Web site.  This article is based on the training session entitled “Precommitment Corrections.”

 

In two articles in these newsletters last month — http://www.e-ratecentral.com/archive/News/News2009/weekly_news_2009_0907.asp#b3 and http://www.e-ratecentral.com/archive/News/News2009/weekly_news_2009_0921.asp#b2 — we discussed the evolving SLD interpretation of the FCC’s Bishop Perry decision and its impact on PIA review procedures.

 

Here’s the background:  In 2006, the FCC issued the Bishop Perry Order (see http://www.e-ratecentral.com/FCC/FCC-06-54A1.doc).  It was one of the most important FCC appeal decisions in the history of the E-rate program.   Besides granting 196 appeals of funding denials resulting from “clerical and ministerial errors,” the FCC directed USAC to change its procedures going forward to help prevent similarly unnecessary denials. 

 

As a result of this directive, SLD application review procedures were changed drastically.  By permitting changes — even if they increased the amount of funding requested — the E‑rate program became markedly more user-friendly.  Changes were accepted, not only during the Receipt Acknowledgment Letter (“RAL”) period immediately following application submission, but later on during the Program Integrity Assurance (“PIA”) application review process.

 

Earlier this summer, with no public announcement, it became apparent that the SLD’s procedures had been drastically changed so as to no longer permit corrections during the PIA process that would increase funding amounts.  Under a stricter interpretation of the Bishop Perry decision, it had been decided that increased funding changes would be accepted only as a part of the RAL process.

 

In mid-September, we learned that the FCC was considering modifications of this stricter interpretation so as to again permit at least certain funding changes during PIA review — probably tied to a stricter definition of “clerical and ministerial errors.” 

 

Slides from the SLD’s training sessions, which began shortly thereafter, suggest that new pre-commitment correction procedures are still evolving.  One slide indicates that, while PIA will work with applicants to correct clerical errors, it will not grant increased funding for applicant-requested changes.  Another slide, however, indicates that increases might be permitted for PIA-identified errors.  Our guess as to what is going on is as follows:

 

1.      The SLD will continue to accept all Form 471 changes identified and reported by applicants during the RAL correction process.  Although it too late to make RAL changes for FY 2009, applicants should make a concerted effort to review — and perhaps rethink — their FY 2010 applications in the second and third weeks of February 2010 after the filing window closes.

2.      Once the RAL correction period has ended, the SLD will be reluctant to permit any changes that would significantly increase funding demand.  If total funding demand were to be a moving target, the SLD would be unable to accurately set Priority 2 funding thresholds.  Indeed, there are indications that the reinterpretation of Bishop Perry procedures was driven largely by requested changes made by several large applicants which would have increased FY 2008 demand by many millions of dollars.

3.      Post-RAL changes by PIA are likely to be handled on a case-by-case basis, usually requiring supporting applicant documentation.  Examples of such changes include:

·         Changes to Block 4 to add or remove entities or correct discount rates

·         Changes to contract award or expiration dates

·         Changes involving competitive bidding issues

·         Changes to Block 5 to increase dollars requested

 

E-Rate Updates and Reminders

 

Key October Filing Deadlines:

 

Only a few weeks remain to file invoices with USAC for discounts on recurring services received during the 2008-2009 fiscal year.  The October 28th invoice deadline applies to both applicant BEARs (Form 472s) and service provider SPIs (Form 474s).  Applicants must allow enough time for their service provider(s) to review and acknowledge their BEARs before the deadline.

 

The deadline for filing a Form 486 (containing the necessary certifications on technology plan approval and CIPA compliance) is the later of 120 days from either the funding date or the start of services.  The Form 486 filing deadline for FY 2009 funding awarded in waves 1-10 (with a service start date of July 1, 2009) is October 29, 2009.  November deadlines for later waves are as follows:

 

                                          Wave 11                11/04/2009

                                          Wave 12                11/11/2009

                                          Wave 13                11/18/2009

                                          Wave 14                11/25/2009

 

More detail on these deadlines is provided in the SLD’s News Brief of October 9th, referenced below.

 

Fall E-Rate Training:

 

The six and seventh of the eight SLD training sessions will be held this week in Los Angeles (Tuesday) and Portland (Thursday).  Schedules and registration information for the remaining three one-day SLD workshops are available on the SLD’s Web site.  Copies of the 2009 Training Slides are also available (see http://usac.org/sl/about/training-presentations/training-presentations-archive/training-2009/fall/materials.aspx).

 

BEARs and Mandatory Electronic Payments:

 

Two weeks ago, the FCC announced that it would be revising its Form 498 and, sometime thereafter, would mandate the disbursement of Universal Service Fund (“USF”) payments by electronic funds transfer.  Last week, USAC clarified[1] that “[s]ervice providers in the Schools and Libraries Program that currently use the Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement (BEAR Form 472) form will continue to receive check payments even if they provide electronic banking information until further notice.”  Presumably, SPI payments will have to be done electronically.

 

Broadband Stimulus Funding and the FCC National Broadband Plan:

 

Over the past few months, we have included several newsletter articles related to nationwide broadband development efforts — including the FCC’s responsibility for developing a National Broadband Plan for submission to Congress by next February.  While not strictly related to E-rate, these broadband initiatives may ultimately affect the program.

 

Last week, the FCC released two Public Notices requesting information and comments on the costs of broadband deployment.  One, which might have E-rate implications, requested cost estimates for connecting “anchor institutions” to fiber (see http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2194A1.pdf).  This Notice includes an appendix providing one set of such cost estimates prepared by the Gates Foundation.  Comments are due October 28th.

 

“Anchor institutions” are specifically defined to include public schools and libraries (plus community colleges and hospitals).  This could be a hint that the FCC is focusing on the role of schools and libraries, particularly in rural areas, to support wider broadband connectivity.  If so, this would probably require changes to the E‑rate program.

 

The second Notice (see http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2186A1.pdf) seeks comments on the impact of “middle” and “second” mile access on broadband availability.  Comments are due November 4th.

 

Since both Notices request cost data that might be deemed proprietary, the FCC also released a companion Protective Order last week to help protect the confidentiality of submitted data (see http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2187A1.pdf). 

 

Schools and Libraries News Brief dated October 9th — October Deadlines

http://www.universalservice.org/sl/tools/news-briefs/preview.aspx?id=260

 

The SLD News Brief for October 9, 2009, discusses the FY 2008 BEAR and FY 2009 Form 486 deadlines (summarized above).  It also provides the following invoicing tips for both applicants and service providers.

 

1.      Tips for applicants filing BEAR forms:

a.       Gather your customer bills and reconcile them before filing BEAR forms.

b.      Make sure your service providers have filed a Service Provider Annual Certification (“SPAC”) Form 473 for FY 2008.

c.       Allow sufficient time for your service provider(s) to review and approve your BEAR forms.

d.      USAC encourages applicants to file their BEAR forms online.

e.       Applicants filing online BEARs should ask their service providers if they know how to access USAC’s online E-File System.

f.       Don’t wait until the last minute to file FY 2008 BEAR forms.

2.      Tips for service providers approving BEAR forms:

a.       Tell your customers what your requirements are for reviewing and approving BEAR forms.

b.      Get online access to review and approve BEAR forms.

c.       Check online at least once each week for pending BEAR forms.

3.      Tips for service providers filing SPI forms:

a.       Gather your customer bills and reconcile them before filing SPI forms.

b.      Make sure you have filed a SPAC form for FY 2008.  (Note: this tip applies to service providers handling applicant BEAR forms as well.)

c.       USAC encourages service providers to file their SPI forms online.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------­­-----------------------------

 

Disclaimer: This newsletter may contain unofficial information on prospective E-rate developments and/or may reflect E-Rate Central’s own interpretations of E-rate practices and regulations. Such information is provided for planning and guidance purposes only. It is not meant, in any way, to supplant official announcements and instructions provided by either the SLD or the FCC.




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.